Berk's Forumvine - Post a reply

Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

How to Train Your Dragon 2 turns ten! Come and share your memories on the thread.

Posting reply to Stoick's Death (Not Confirmed, Possible Spoilers: Read At Your Own Risk!
Clickable Emoticons
Clickable Emoticons	NightFuryChic wrote: > [quote=mr.k.c.w.,(time=1401717268)][quote=Cartoon > Freak,(time=1401707445)]By the same logic, a writer inflicting any sort of > suffering on a character is wrong. Yet without suffering, there is no > conflict, and without conflict, there is no story. Do you really want to > watch a movie where everyone is happy all the time? > > [spoiler]As for the timing of Stoick's death, it is true that it lends the > event some extra dramatic punch in the short term (a very good thing, if > you ask me), but it does also leave Hiccup - and, for that matter, Valka - > with support that they wouldn't have had if Stoick had died at some other > time. And has been said many other times, most elegantly by > TheEleventhViking, Stoick's death is necessary at some point in the overall > story. It's really just a matter of whether the second or third film is > the better time.[/spoiler][/quote] > > [quote=Lastandir,(time=1401711747)] > > Death is a part of a life, so why should not be a part of a stories? Of > course - killing everyone just like in Game of Throne will not be so smart, > especially in movie for younger people. I don't like too "mass > killing", but if death is used wisely in story, then why not?[/quote] > > Point taken. It's just that it will be sad to see that.[/quote] > > I think the point of is that characters are supposed to be sad, along with > the audience.
Post Options
Post Options	Disable automatically parsing URLs in your post

Last Post

rayray1902 08 Jun 2014, 00:50

Lovely description! That was exactly what I saw in the movie theater the other day. Thanks!

Members · Contact us · Delete cookies

It is currently 16 Jun 2025, 23:20