Berk's Forumvine - Post a reply

Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]

How to Train Your Dragon 2 turns ten! Come and share your memories on the thread.

Posting reply to Was the death of stoick really necessary?
Topic Title
Clickable Emoticons
Clickable Emoticons	Night fury fire wrote: > I know some people will totally disagree with me on this. But I just wonder > why they killed stoick in the first place > > Lots of people are saying that stoick [i]had[/i] to die for hiccup to > become chief. But when people say that I instantly think of dagur, and how > he said his father was "eliminated", I don't want to fell like > there was no other option for hiccup to become chief. But at the start of > the film stoick was going to retire anyway. And it almost felt like > chiefdom was just forced upon him. > > Secondly, stoicks death didn't really seem to connect to anything, apart > from some character development between hiccup and toothless. It also felt > slightly like a cliché, because of the fact that everything was right and > then suddenly it all went wrong. > > The first time I went to see it, my mom said that stoicks death was a bit > to much, and I agree. It wasn't just the fact that he died, it was how he > died. Brainwashing toothless, who had been acting so cute and protective, > against them. Even though there are lots of mature fans of httyd, there are > also lots of younger fans, and I doubt this went down very well. > > Of course, they may have had to kill to him, because Gerard was not > planning to come back. But apart from that the death only seemed to be > added for emotional content, and some character development. > > I probably just started a fandom war against myself...but please remember > this is only my opinion.
Post Options
Post Options	Disable automatically parsing URLs in your post

Members · Contact us · Delete cookies

It is currently 15 Jun 2025, 23:33