Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Can Toothless Fly? | |
---|---|
Topic Started: 06 Jun 2014, 13:04 (3181 Views) | |
TheCube42 | 06 Jun 2014, 13:04 Post #11 |
(As Not Seen on TV)
|
Start of good physics work. Though, two questions come to me: 1. What does lowercase "a" and uppercase "B" signify in this context? 2. I realize that v(t) should approach v-terminal as t approaches infinity. However, wouldn't the limit of (e^β-1)/(e^β+1) at t = infinity be 1, since as t approaches infinity, β approaches infinity? Or is there something beyond the simple limit that causes the limit to be sqrt(2)? |
Σ (a sigma-ture) | |
Zer0x | 07 Jun 2014, 08:39 Post #12 |
[b]Banhammerdragon [/b]
|
Hollow cylinders are more resistant than solid ones, especially when they are strutted inside. They could also be more flexible than the bones from normal tetrapods (maybe with some sort of natural aramid-like aramids [No, I did not steal this from Avatar!]).
1.) a, B and β are just variables I've used for substitutions, they were necessary to solve the integral. It also makes the formula clearer. 2.) When t approaches infinity the whole second term with the euleric function becomes 1, that means v(t)=a and then you are at v=sqrt((2xmxg)/(pxAxc)) which is the formula for the maximum speed you coud reach while falling. t is the ony variable, all others are constant. Maybe this explains it a bit better. (Everything after the integral is not correct.) |
UNAMUSED No, I'm serious....stop it.. | |
TheCube42 | 07 Jun 2014, 09:58 Post #13 |
(As Not Seen on TV)
|
But a = sqrt(mg/ρAc) as you've written at the end of the sheet. Or was that supposed to be sqrt(2mg/ρAc), in which case a=v_terminal? EDIT: Yep, from your link, right before you define/substitute B near the beginning, the 1/2 in drag force disappears. If you keep it, B = ρAc/2mg, so a = sqrt(2mg/ρAc) = v_terminal, and everything makes sense. |
Σ (a sigma-ture) | |
Zer0x | 08 Jun 2014, 06:27 Post #14 |
[b]Banhammerdragon [/b]
|
Yes, sorry. That was a mistake. |
UNAMUSED No, I'm serious....stop it.. | |
mr.k.c.w. | 08 Jun 2014, 07:08 Post #15 |
Dragon fan in Hong Kong
[b](Above this title is a very dorky Hiccup.) [/b]
|
Your statement about the falling formula might not be correct. Any object that is falling from a certain height will eventually reach terminal velocity and doesn't accelerate anymore. Now I know that Toothless will eventually flap his wings but let's just say that he dived from a very high attitude. At a certain point, he won't gain anymore speed due to him reaching terminal velocity. So, the formula's statement will not be correct if Toothless already reached terminal velocity. (There's just one flaw in my statement, I haven't figure out how long will Toothless take for him to reach terminal velocity. So he might hit the ground first before ever reaching terminal velocity, thus, making my point invalid.) Also, just asking, while Toothless is flying, shouldn't you count in the force that gravity puts on him? |
Nothing is in this signature, except this sentence describing that there is nothing in this signature. Seriously, I, [INSERT USERNAME HERE] have nothing to say here. Continue on with your viewing of not-so regularly scheduled posts. [INSERT CALMING, SUITABLE FOR READING MUSIC] Sorry to interrupt, I just wanna say....uh...what was I trying to say again? Never mind, continue reading. | |
Zer0x | 08 Jun 2014, 08:19 Post #16 |
[b]Banhammerdragon [/b]
|
Yes, you're right. The formula doesn't work when v0 > a (because the ln from a negative value isn't defined), but I think we don't need to pay much attention to that case. He will never reach terminal velocity (a), because t would have to become infinite. It is in TheCube42's calculation, but not directly. That was the meaning of the whole thing, to calculate the lift that counter the weight. |
UNAMUSED No, I'm serious....stop it.. | |
mr.k.c.w. | 08 Jun 2014, 08:46 Post #17 |
Dragon fan in Hong Kong
[b](Above this title is a very dorky Hiccup.) [/b]
|
You're right about that, but what I think is that as long as we can define the distance were the acceleration started, you can't say that t would be infinite. Though we need to pin-point the velocity of one particular moment and the time to reach that velocity... |
Nothing is in this signature, except this sentence describing that there is nothing in this signature. Seriously, I, [INSERT USERNAME HERE] have nothing to say here. Continue on with your viewing of not-so regularly scheduled posts. [INSERT CALMING, SUITABLE FOR READING MUSIC] Sorry to interrupt, I just wanna say....uh...what was I trying to say again? Never mind, continue reading. | |
HideousZippleback | 08 Jun 2014, 17:45 Post #18 |
[color=blue]I'm just here for Snotlout. [/color]
|
I'm sad because I don't understand any of the math and equation stuff going on here... And what about Cloudjumper? Could he really physically fly in real life with four wings? |
mr.k.c.w. | 08 Jun 2014, 19:15 Post #19 |
Dragon fan in Hong Kong
[b](Above this title is a very dorky Hiccup.) [/b]
|
Actually, I'm still a little foggy about the formulas but when it comes to basic physics concepts , I've learned a bit from watching a good few seasons of Mythbusters. You should too, it's a good show. |
Nothing is in this signature, except this sentence describing that there is nothing in this signature. Seriously, I, [INSERT USERNAME HERE] have nothing to say here. Continue on with your viewing of not-so regularly scheduled posts. [INSERT CALMING, SUITABLE FOR READING MUSIC] Sorry to interrupt, I just wanna say....uh...what was I trying to say again? Never mind, continue reading. | |
HideousZippleback | 08 Jun 2014, 19:32 Post #20 |
[color=blue]I'm just here for Snotlout. [/color]
|
I LOVE Mythbusters! I just don't know where to watch it online... >.> |
Users browsing this forum:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
|
|
Print view |
Go to Next Page | |
« Previous Topic · Other Fan Work · Next Topic » |
Members · Contact us · Delete cookies | It is currently 05 Jun 2024, 07:15 |