Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
A pairing you hate...
Topic Started: 04 Jun 2014, 17:54 (16784 Views)
Faerie_Dragon
User avatar
Dragon Bassist

MissunyNightFury
04 Jun 2014, 21:49
Zer0x
04 Jun 2014, 21:39
Cartoon Freak
04 Jun 2014, 21:13
Regarding other matters, I can totally buy Valka/Toothless. I'm pretty sure that popping-out-tail-fin thing from the third trailer (I'm tired, and you know what I mean) could qualify as some form of foreplay. Not that either of those pairings are my thing, but I'm sure they can be done in ways that work.
Do you speak of sexual relationships with all its features or only about something like a 'love based advanced friendship'?
I really don't like what he's suggesting. It's getting extremely uncomfortable.
Whaaaaaat. It's just starting to get juicy! ;)
I challenge you to be lazier than me!

Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me.
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
Zer0x
User avatar

[b]Banhammerdragon
[/b]

He's just saying what COULD be possible, the truth is always terrifying. There are also people in this world who are in love with buildings, computers, cloths, shoes, power stations and so on. They are all not 'normal'. But what is normal? As someone who would rather see Hiccup and Astrid die than let them have a wedding, I am also not normal. The human mind can be very strange.
UNAMUSED

No, I'm serious....stop it..
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
Cartoon Freak
User avatar
Deadly Nadder

MissunyNightFury
04 Jun 2014, 21:37
I think those who support Valka/Hiccup and Toothless/Hiccup have serious mental problems. They don't seem to understand why it's wrong.
Speaking not as someone who supports these pairings but simply doesn't see the issue with them, perhaps you can explain why they are wrong. Bear in mind that I assume anyone who supports these pairings pictures Toothless as being sufficiently intelligent to give informed consent (whether or not this is an accurate mental image is another matter, but it doesn't take much imagination to get to that point). In other words, it's absolutely nothing like raping a dog (not your phrasing, I know, but I thought it best to address the idea).

Note also that most dragons within the franchise do not appear to have sufficient intelligence to give informed consent. Therefore, I am against most Viking/dragon pairings, just not ones that involve Toothless (Cloudjumper currently gets a pass as well, since he appears to have a similar level of intelligence).
Zer0x
04 Jun 2014, 21:39
Cartoon Freak
04 Jun 2014, 21:13
Regarding other matters, I can totally buy Valka/Toothless. I'm pretty sure that popping-out-tail-fin thing from the third trailer (I'm tired, and you know what I mean) could qualify as some form of foreplay.

Not that either of those pairings are my thing, but I'm sure they can be done in ways that work.
Do you speak of sexual relationships with all its features or only about something like a 'love based advanced friendship'?
In this context, I am talking about the former, though obviously, the pairing would be more meaningful with the latter as well.
Number of times I've watched the trailer: 18.

My pet peeve: people who refer to complete strangers by their first name. The correct ways to refer to a "John Smith" whom you have never met are Smith, Mr Smith, or John Smith. Not "John". He's not your buddy.
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
MissunyNightFury
User avatar
Escaped from an asylem

Zer0x
04 Jun 2014, 21:58
He's just saying what COULD be possible, the truth is always terrifying. There are also people in this world who are in love with buildings, computers, cloths, shoes, power stations and so on. They are all not 'normal'. But what is normal? As someone who would rather see Hiccup and Astrid die than let them have a wedding, I am also not normal. The human mind can be very strange.
I don't understand the human brain; it's so fascinating, yet so terrifying. There is no such thing as normality, it's only a myth. The point I'm trying to get across with him is that just because it could happen doesn't mean it should. I don't know, maybe I'm not seeing his point because I love animals, and the very idea hurts me inside.
"There's something you must remember when riding a dragon. There's no manual, no safety harness, no guarantees when you're on one of these beasts. All you have is the wind in your hair, and the clothes on your back. The only thing between you and that dragon is your saddle. You need to hold onto it for dear life, as that creature takes you the skies. That, is dragon riding."
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
Cartoon Freak
User avatar
Deadly Nadder

MissunyNightFury
04 Jun 2014, 22:35
Zer0x
04 Jun 2014, 21:58
He's just saying what COULD be possible, the truth is always terrifying. There are also people in this world who are in love with buildings, computers, cloths, shoes, power stations and so on. They are all not 'normal'. But what is normal? As someone who would rather see Hiccup and Astrid die than let them have a wedding, I am also not normal. The human mind can be very strange.
I don't understand the human brain; it's so fascinating, yet so terrifying. There is no such thing as normality, it's only a myth. The point I'm trying to get across with him is that just because it could happen doesn't mean it should. I don't know, maybe I'm not seeing his point because I love animals, and the very idea hurts me inside.
Okay, let's change the example here, to illustrate the point while keeping as free from mental blocks as possible. You probably have some familiarity with Spock from Star Trek. If you don't, then he is the son of a human woman and a Vulcan (think elf, and you have the right basic idea) male. This is, of course, a cross-species pairing. Is this pairing strange? Yes, at least in-universe. Is it morally wrong? Well, the audience is certainly not positioned to feel that way. These are two intelligent beings expressing their mutual love for one another in a completely consensual way.

In that regard, Hiccup/Toothless and Valka/Toothless would be exactly the same - two intelligent beings expressing their mutual love for each other in a completely consensual way - just with stranger kinks. And yes, those kinks are a lot stranger, but being strange is not inherently wrong.
Number of times I've watched the trailer: 18.

My pet peeve: people who refer to complete strangers by their first name. The correct ways to refer to a "John Smith" whom you have never met are Smith, Mr Smith, or John Smith. Not "John". He's not your buddy.
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
AndyMay
User avatar
[b][color=#d51c1c]The Lemon God[/color][/b]

Zer0x
04 Jun 2014, 20:53
Faerie_Dragon
04 Jun 2014, 20:37
Valka x Toothless <3
Are you drunk?
He's Irish, what do you expect?!

XD
Top Poester for 6 Months Award :D
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
AndyMay
User avatar
[b][color=#d51c1c]The Lemon God[/color][/b]

Oh I'd I like to remind those who've forgotten about:

RULES 34, 35, and 36


Once you remind yourself of these rules, you stop having problems with any ships. :)
Top Poester for 6 Months Award :D
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
Faerie_Dragon
User avatar
Dragon Bassist

AndyMay
04 Jun 2014, 23:52
Oh I'd I like to remind those who've forgotten about:
RULES 24, 25, and 36
Once you remind yourself of these rules, you stop having problems with any ships. :)
24. Every repost is always a repost of a repost.
25. Relation to the original topic decreases with every single post.
36. There will always be more fucked up shit than what you just saw.

Em.
I challenge you to be lazier than me!

Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me.
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
AndyMay
User avatar
[b][color=#d51c1c]The Lemon God[/color][/b]

Faerie_Dragon
04 Jun 2014, 23:59
AndyMay
04 Jun 2014, 23:52
Oh I'd I like to remind those who've forgotten about:
RULES 24, 25, and 36
Once you remind yourself of these rules, you stop having problems with any ships. :)
24. Every repost is always a repost of a repost.
25. Relation to the original topic decreases with every single post.
36. There will always be more fucked up shit than what you just saw.

Em.
It's dark so I can't see my keys very well lol, so I accidentally pressed 2 instead of 3.

and Rule 36 is 'If it exists, somebody has a fetish of it'
Top Poester for 6 Months Award :D
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
MissunyNightFury
User avatar
Escaped from an asylem

AndyMay
04 Jun 2014, 23:52
Oh I'd I like to remind those who've forgotten about:

RULES 34, 35, and 36


Once you remind yourself of these rules, you stop having problems with any ships. :)
Ew.
"There's something you must remember when riding a dragon. There's no manual, no safety harness, no guarantees when you're on one of these beasts. All you have is the wind in your hair, and the clothes on your back. The only thing between you and that dragon is your saddle. You need to hold onto it for dear life, as that creature takes you the skies. That, is dragon riding."
  PM (offline)     Profile     Quote  
 
Users browsing this forum:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
Print view
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · How to Train Your Dragon 2 · Next Topic »