Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
A pairing you hate... | |
---|---|
Topic Started: 04 Jun 2014, 17:54 (16784 Views) | |
Faerie_Dragon | 04 Jun 2014, 17:54 Post #71 |
![]()
Dragon Bassist
![]()
![]() |
Whaaaaaat. It's just starting to get juicy! ![]() |
I challenge you to be lazier than me! Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Zer0x | 04 Jun 2014, 17:58 Post #72 |
![]() [b]Banhammerdragon [/b] ![]()
![]() |
He's just saying what COULD be possible, the truth is always terrifying. There are also people in this world who are in love with buildings, computers, cloths, shoes, power stations and so on. They are all not 'normal'. But what is normal? As someone who would rather see Hiccup and Astrid die than let them have a wedding, I am also not normal. The human mind can be very strange. |
UNAMUSED No, I'm serious....stop it.. | |
Cartoon Freak | 04 Jun 2014, 18:33 Post #73 |
![]()
Deadly Nadder
![]()
![]() |
Speaking not as someone who supports these pairings but simply doesn't see the issue with them, perhaps you can explain why they are wrong. Bear in mind that I assume anyone who supports these pairings pictures Toothless as being sufficiently intelligent to give informed consent (whether or not this is an accurate mental image is another matter, but it doesn't take much imagination to get to that point). In other words, it's absolutely nothing like raping a dog (not your phrasing, I know, but I thought it best to address the idea). Note also that most dragons within the franchise do not appear to have sufficient intelligence to give informed consent. Therefore, I am against most Viking/dragon pairings, just not ones that involve Toothless (Cloudjumper currently gets a pass as well, since he appears to have a similar level of intelligence). In this context, I am talking about the former, though obviously, the pairing would be more meaningful with the latter as well. |
Number of times I've watched the trailer: 18. My pet peeve: people who refer to complete strangers by their first name. The correct ways to refer to a "John Smith" whom you have never met are Smith, Mr Smith, or John Smith. Not "John". He's not your buddy. | |
MissunyNightFury | 04 Jun 2014, 18:35 Post #74 |
![]()
Escaped from an asylem
![]()
![]() |
I don't understand the human brain; it's so fascinating, yet so terrifying. There is no such thing as normality, it's only a myth. The point I'm trying to get across with him is that just because it could happen doesn't mean it should. I don't know, maybe I'm not seeing his point because I love animals, and the very idea hurts me inside. |
"There's something you must remember when riding a dragon. There's no manual, no safety harness, no guarantees when you're on one of these beasts. All you have is the wind in your hair, and the clothes on your back. The only thing between you and that dragon is your saddle. You need to hold onto it for dear life, as that creature takes you the skies. That, is dragon riding." | |
Cartoon Freak | 04 Jun 2014, 18:53 Post #75 |
![]()
Deadly Nadder
![]()
![]() |
Okay, let's change the example here, to illustrate the point while keeping as free from mental blocks as possible. You probably have some familiarity with Spock from Star Trek. If you don't, then he is the son of a human woman and a Vulcan (think elf, and you have the right basic idea) male. This is, of course, a cross-species pairing. Is this pairing strange? Yes, at least in-universe. Is it morally wrong? Well, the audience is certainly not positioned to feel that way. These are two intelligent beings expressing their mutual love for one another in a completely consensual way. In that regard, Hiccup/Toothless and Valka/Toothless would be exactly the same - two intelligent beings expressing their mutual love for each other in a completely consensual way - just with stranger kinks. And yes, those kinks are a lot stranger, but being strange is not inherently wrong. |
Number of times I've watched the trailer: 18. My pet peeve: people who refer to complete strangers by their first name. The correct ways to refer to a "John Smith" whom you have never met are Smith, Mr Smith, or John Smith. Not "John". He's not your buddy. | |
AndyMay | 04 Jun 2014, 19:45 Post #76 |
![]()
[b][color=#d51c1c]The Lemon God[/color][/b]
![]()
![]() |
He's Irish, what do you expect?! XD |
![]() ![]() | |
AndyMay | 04 Jun 2014, 19:52 Post #77 |
![]()
[b][color=#d51c1c]The Lemon God[/color][/b]
![]()
![]() |
Oh I'd I like to remind those who've forgotten about: RULES 34, 35, and 36 Once you remind yourself of these rules, you stop having problems with any ships. ![]() |
![]() ![]() | |
Faerie_Dragon | 04 Jun 2014, 19:59 Post #78 |
![]()
Dragon Bassist
![]()
![]() |
24. Every repost is always a repost of a repost. 25. Relation to the original topic decreases with every single post. 36. There will always be more fucked up shit than what you just saw. Em. |
I challenge you to be lazier than me! Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. Sub me. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
AndyMay | 04 Jun 2014, 20:12 Post #79 |
![]()
[b][color=#d51c1c]The Lemon God[/color][/b]
![]()
![]() |
It's dark so I can't see my keys very well lol, so I accidentally pressed 2 instead of 3. and Rule 36 is 'If it exists, somebody has a fetish of it' |
![]() ![]() | |
MissunyNightFury | 04 Jun 2014, 20:56 Post #80 |
![]()
Escaped from an asylem
![]()
![]() |
Ew. |
"There's something you must remember when riding a dragon. There's no manual, no safety harness, no guarantees when you're on one of these beasts. All you have is the wind in your hair, and the clothes on your back. The only thing between you and that dragon is your saddle. You need to hold onto it for dear life, as that creature takes you the skies. That, is dragon riding." | |
Users browsing this forum:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
|
|
Print view |
Go to Next Page | |
« Previous Topic · How to Train Your Dragon 2 · Next Topic » |
Members · Contact us · Delete cookies | It is currently 16 Jun 2025, 18:23 |